Development of Angband Orcish ‘our’

by Björn Axén

I never liked the possessive pronoun ‘dimba’ (our) that I coined for Angband Orcish (AO). In the post were I coined it I wrote: “The first person stem in PE [primitive elvish] is ni and which gives us AO di to which the pluralmarker –m is attached: dim. To this the possessive ending –ba, from PE –, is added: dimba.”

The problem is the –mb– cluster, it just sounds to much like Elvish for Orcish speech so I think I will add a phonetic rule that medially -mb- change to -ghb-. So ‘our’ is now instead dighba. Yes I know the combination is found in the ring verse (gimbatul and the similar krimpatul)

The line “a star shines on the hour of our meeting” is then instead

Zhán shila zhúm-da banar-ghu dighba or Zhán shila zhúm-shi banar-ghu dighba.

We can make this rule more general så all the similar clusters have similar changes. I will use the dummy words *dinda and *dinga which at least for now does not mean anything in Angband Orcish.

dinda: -nd- > -zd- > dizda

dinga: -Vng- > -VVg- > díga

It would be interesting to hear what you think of this.